Archives for April 2023

Day 27 – April 20

News

Louisiana will be at less risk from flooding in 50 years under new $50 billion coastal plan

Leaving Leeville – Louisiana coastal migration 100 years ago.

Remembering winter extreme weather: Winter Storm Uri 2021

A key part of America’s plan to slash carbon emissions: Plug in cars and trucks.

The Hill: Texas bills call for renewables to help save declining fossil fuel sector.

Liquified Natural Cash: How Methane Exports Reverse Climate Progress, Harm Consumers, and Endanger Communities – how the natural gas industry has used the Ukraine war to lock in long-term purchased agreements.

Republicans seek to repeal renewable tax credits, pass energy package in debt limit proposal

Assignment

Finish materials from last class and discuss living with climate change. No new technical materials for the exam.

Slides – Introduction to Flood Risk and the NFIP – final

Day 26 – April 18

News

The New York Times: Germany Quits Nuclear Power, Ending a Decades-Long Struggle.

Historic Fort Lauderdale Flooding Swamped Homes

Thousands of acres are underwater in California, and the flood could triple in size this summer

April 22nd – Earthday 2023, the 53rd Earthday. Watch the video.

Assignment

We will carry over the materials from last class.

LSU Flood Maps Site – Look up some addresses and play with the maps. This will give a quick introduction to flood maps.

Review the standard policy for residential flood insurance: Dwelling Form Standard Flood Insurance Policy F-122 / October 2021

Focus on the specifics of what is covered and what is excluded. After every major flood, there are a lot of news stories about how people are being cheated by the NFIP underwriters. A lot of these complaints are driven by the insured and their lawyers not knowing the difference between the limited coverage of the NFIP policy compared to a usual homeowner’s policy.

Contesting NFIP claims. Since NFIP insurance is a federal government benefit, the claims and their appeals are governed by federal administrative law, rather than state law. These two cases outline the process and the pitfalls if you treat an NFIP claim like a state insurance claim. I have provided a video review to facilitate our classroom discussion of the cases.

Gibson v. American Bankers Insurance Co., 289 F.3d 943 (6th Cir. 2002) – annotated

DeCosta v. Allstate Ins. Co., 730 F.3d 76, 77 (1st Cir. 2013) – annotated

Video Review – Suing over NFIP Claim Denials

Day 26 – April 13

News

Allen, R.J., Zhao, X., Randles, C.A. et al. Surface warming and wetting due to methane’s long-wave radiative effects muted by short-wave absorption. Nat. Geosci. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-023-01144-z

Clouds are a wild card in climate models because we do not understand all the factors that affect their formation and effect on warming. This paper finds a potential offset of some of the warming potential for methane because it may increase the formation of clouds.

Li, Q., England, M.H., Hogg, A.M. et al. Abyssal ocean overturning slowdown and warming driven by Antarctic meltwater. Nature 615, 841–847 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05762-w

Dangendorf, S. et al., 2022. Acceleration of US Southeast and Gulf Coast Sea-Level Rise Amplified by Internal Climate Variability. – This comes out of Tulane. The caveats at the end of the paper are important, but are being ignored by the media.

Assignment

We will finish our discussion of homeowner’s insurance, then start with flood insurance.

We are going to take a deep dive into the National Flood Insurance Program. Prior to the NFIP, there was no flood insurance available for residential housing and small businesses. This limited development in coastal and high risk inland flood areas to extremely cheap housing  or housing for the those who were rich enough to not care if their house was destroyed by flooding. Starting in 1968, this federal benefits program fueled a massive migration to high risk flood areas on the rivers and the coast by providing highly subsidized flood insurance. This has had massive unintended consequences as climate change increases the flood risk for these areas and many of the property owners can not afford unsubsidized rates. Many lawyers and insurance brokers do not understand the NFIP policy limitations and claims process. The NFIP looks like insurance, but the policy is a federal regulation, not a contract. Filing and appealing a claim are governed by federal regulations and subject to administrative law constraints. This is an area fraught with bad client counseling and malpractice. We are going to explore the policy issues posed by the NFIP. We also going to get into the weeds so you will know enough to competently counsel clients on the NFIP.

A Brief Introduction to the National Flood Insurance Program

FEMA, Answers to Questions About the NFIP (April 2022)

Slides – Introduction to Flood Risk and the NFIP

This is the official guide to the NFIP. Read to p. 42. There is a glossary at the end that you should refer to as you see new terms.

Day 25 – April 11

News

Storms, insurance turmoil fueling Louisiana population slides

Louisiana v. Biden – Attack on the study committee working on the value for the social cost of carbon. The 5th Cir. found that plaintiffs had no standing.

Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners of Boulder County – Exxon Brief – Artful pleading vs. well-pleaded: can the plaintiffs escape removal by just not mentioning federal law, or should the court look beyond their pleadings? Click the link and look at the highlighted material on pages 8&9.

Assignment

We will finish our discussion of the hurricane cases from last time.

Home owner’s insurance slides

LA Homeowner’s Insurance Cases and Crisis of Cost and Availability

Private residential and small business insurance policies (State Farm, Farmers, Allstate, etc.) do not include flood insurance as part of their homeowner’s insurance. Almost all residential and small business flood insurance comes from the federal government through the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). We will look at that program later in the class. Most people are not required to have flood insurance so after every major flooding event attorneys sue homeowner’s insurance companies to try to get coverage for clients who do not have flood insurance. We are going to look at two Louisiana cases that to see how the courts handle this problem. This will be background for our class discussion of the homeowner’s insurance crisis in Louisiana.

When there is a major flood event, we have two situations. The first is homeowners who do not have flood insurance but suffer flood damage, either with or without wind and rain damage that is covered by their homeowner’s policies. When their home floods, they bring legal claims arguing that they thought that their homeowner’s policy covered flooding. This case deals with the construction of insurance policies. Read through paragraph 72. We are not reading the remainder of the case, which is a technical fight over which version of the bad faith penalties statute applies in the case. I have annotated the case so that it will be a fast read.

Sher v Lafayette Insurance Co – annotated

The second situation is homeowners who have purchased flood insurance policies and suffer flood damage, either with or without wind and rain damage that is covered by their homeowner’s policies. The Nelson case looks at the application of the Louisiana Valued Policy Law when a property is covered by a flood policy as well as a homeowners policy. The LVP requires insurers to pay the face value of the policy if the house is a total loss. The LVP prevents insurers from basing premiums on a higher value for a house than they are willing to pay if the house is a total loss. For example, you insure at $800,000 for your New Orleans home, because that is its current market value. That market value includes an inflated cost for the land, which is not damaged by flood or fire. Thus, when your house burns to the ground, the insurer only offers you $600,000 because that is all it will take to rebuild your house. You have paid the insurer for an extra $200,000 in coverage which you cannot collect. If you can prove a total loss, the insurer must pay the full $800,000. The problem arises when the damages are covered by two different policies. Assume the house is a total loss after Hurricane Ida, but half the damage is from flooding – covered by the NFIP policy – and the other half is wind and rain damage, covered by the homeowner’s policy. Is the LVP triggered because the house is a total loss, or is not triggered because the total loss has to be caused by the risks covered by the homeowner’s policy? (The LVP cannot be applied to the NFIP policy because that is legally a government benefit that is not reached by state law.) Focus on understanding Louisiana’s Valued Policy Law and how it affects situations where there is both flood and wind/fire damage.

Nelson v. Americas Ins. Co., No. CV 17-850-JWD-RLB, 2019 WL 5684503 (M.D. La. Nov. 1, 2019)

Watch this video review of these cases so we do not have to go over the basics in class – Louisiana Insurance Law and Flooding.

Is Tort Law Salvation or Damnation: Why Does Insurance Cost So Much in Louisiana?

Read these background materials for our discussion of the homeowner’s insurance crisis in Louisiana. (You can Google Louisiana insurance crises for more information.) We are going to talk about the politics of tort law as a remedy for injuries and about the economics of insurance. Having taken torts, you are well-versed in the plaintiff’s lawyer’s views of the tort system. These readings will acquaint you with the insurance company side. (Note – the truth is somewhere between the extremes, but it is also true that you never get money from insurance companies, only from other policyholders.)

Triple-I: Louisiana’s Insurance Crisis Grew After 2020-21 Hurricanes – this is a quick review of recent hurricane losses in Louisiana.

Affordability of Personal Auto Insurance 3x Worse in Louisiana Compared to Most Affordable State, IRC Study Finds – auto insurance in LA is as bad as you expected.

IT’S NOT JUST THE WEATHER: The man-made crises roiling property insurance markets – This is an insurance industry critique of the effects of the plaintiff’s bar on insurance costs. Read the general information and the Louisiana section.

Is Louisiana a judicial hellhole?

Exam Information

Update – The exam will have only multiple-choice questions. (Some questions will only have 2 choices – true/false.)

If any questions depend on detailed information about a statute or regulation, it will be provided as part of the exam materials.

I have posted some study questions on Moodle so you can get a sense of the types of questions that will be on the exam. These are sample questions and are not meant to be comprehensive. The slides and presentation materials are a good review of the key information in the course when you are preparing for the exam.

The exam is in class, closed book, using Exam4. The exam questions will be on paper – it is not embedded in the software for in class exams. If this is a problem for you, you should talk to Assoc. Dean Henry for any necessary accommodation.

If you feel any of the multiple-choice questions are problematic, you may add a section to your exam in the Exam4 software to list the question number, your answer, and your comments for each problematic question. I read these before the exams are graded and exclude any questions that I agree are problematic.

Exam Q & A – I will post questions from students and my answers on this page to assure that any important information is available to all students. The most recent questions will be posted at the top.

Day 24 – April 4

News

Venice Is Saved! Woe Is Venice.

The Conversation: The UK’s first climate refugees: why more defences may not save this village from rising sea levels.

Which Louisiana parishes have lost the most population? See the map here

Assignment

Slides for the class discussion – Lessons from the New Orleans Hurricane Cases

I have the videos and the corresponding PowerPoints of the lecture presentations on suing the federal government for money damages. You should read the materials and watch these before class. We will discuss them in class, which should be interesting for all of us. (Remember, the video was made from the PowerPoint deck. I am providing the deck as an alternative way of viewing the presentation.)

Hurricane Katrina and the subsequent litigation attempting to hold the United States responsible for the damages due to the levee breaches have become part of the mythology attempting to shift the blame for catastrophic flooding from bad local land-use decisions to the federal government’s failure to protect the communities which made those decisions. The starting point for understanding this law is the Constitutional and statutory standards for suing the United States for money damages for torts. This is governed by the Federal Tort Claims Act. This is an explanation of the FTCA that I have prepared for use in class:

Introduction to the Federal Tort Claims Act

This is the form for filing an FTCA claim. Review it so you understand the required information:

Form 95 – CLAIM FOR DAMAGE, INJURY, OR DEATH

Video – Suing the Federal Government: Sovereign Immunity and FTCA History

PowerPoint – Suing the Federal Government: Sovereign Immunity and FTCA History

Video – Filing an FTCA Claim

Narrated PowerPoint – Filing an FTCA Claim

The Discretionary Function Exception (DFE)

The DFE makes proving a case under the FTCA fundamentally different from a private tort case. The DFE is intended to protect government decision-making from collateral attack through tort litigation. It is the second malpractice trap for lawyers in the FTCA. As you will see, it goes against conventional torts jurisprudence, sheltering the government from liability for actions that would result in judgments and even punitive damages against private parties.

Video – Texas Department of Public Safety film of the aftermath of the Texas City Disaster

WWW sites – The Texas City Disaster. April 16, 1947 – Galveston News

Background for the Dalehite case in the reader.

Federal Tort Claims Act Reader

These are edited versions of the key cases setting out the construction of discretionary function exception in the FTCA.

Video – Federal Tort Claims Act – DFE

Narrated Powerpoints – Federal Tort Claims Act – DFE